i've been toying with the idea of just coming out and posting my name and location as an attempt to be available to locals that secretly browse the forum that have known me for up to 25 years.
( "reaching out", so to speak ).
i'm not da'd or df'd, so this most certainly could end in a dramatic confrontation.
Hi Kairos, my hubby & I say 'hi' and send you hugs... I understand how you feel, wanting to be free, and prevented by the evil organization.... This Aussie thing will open many eyes as to the workings of the org, and perhaps be the crack in the dam that will get things streaming, right?
Hang in there, breathe.... hugs.......
first off, i don't think that dude is going to show face.
he's most likely on a plane already.
if he shows it's bad pr and if he doesn't show it's bad pr.
I was thinking the same thing, Listener, as that is how the theocratic warfare game is played.
"Omission"
They swore to tell the WHOLE truth, not 'just' the parts asked.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
Splash, did u email this list to the RC? It's great, and shows just how creative the Org can be.
WT does not use the same terminology in each instance, making it harder for anyone to be able to put their finger on it, which is all a part of their very well thought out "spiritual warfare."
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/downloadfile.ashx?guid=7ba22716-556c-43c2-9fc6-76697afad440&type=exhibit&filename=wat.0001.004.0076&fileextension=pdf
Perhaps, boc, they are saving this for the cherry on top!?
sorry as this topic may have been covered many times but any thoughts or links to other topics on how the pro-jw websites are commenting on this.. rub a dub.
Good for YOU cattails! Yep, the GB can get on you tube and "lying say every wicked thing" that they want to say, but if anyone ELSE opens their mouth, and tells the truth they are APOSTATE!
Right?
all jws on the stand have stuck to the same line that they have no problem with cooperating with mandatory reporting when state law requires it.. if the law does not require it then bible principles absolutely prevent them from taking away rights of the victim to report abuse to the police or not.. we have already heard from a jw rep a couple of days ago who proudly asserted that when the law conflicts with bible principle they will always obey the bible and quoted acts 5:29 "we must obey god rather than men".. please join the dots!.
I am going to write one also.... with many things included. Tho Angus and the judge, and the one woman attorney that we heard from at the end, have been very well educated as to many things the "GB/ ORG" can do, you really have to know the mind of them, don't you?
The subtleties, the nuances, the innuendos, the twisting and manipulation are difficult for the outsider to get a good grasp of.
all jws on the stand have stuck to the same line that they have no problem with cooperating with mandatory reporting when state law requires it.. if the law does not require it then bible principles absolutely prevent them from taking away rights of the victim to report abuse to the police or not.. we have already heard from a jw rep a couple of days ago who proudly asserted that when the law conflicts with bible principle they will always obey the bible and quoted acts 5:29 "we must obey god rather than men".. please join the dots!.
I agree Marvin, JW's claim elders are suppose to be shepherds and look out for the flock, right?
However, whenever you do not put someone's best interests first, you clearly are not 'looking out for them.'
all jws on the stand have stuck to the same line that they have no problem with cooperating with mandatory reporting when state law requires it.. if the law does not require it then bible principles absolutely prevent them from taking away rights of the victim to report abuse to the police or not.. we have already heard from a jw rep a couple of days ago who proudly asserted that when the law conflicts with bible principle they will always obey the bible and quoted acts 5:29 "we must obey god rather than men".. please join the dots!.
Cofty.... That is the point, reporting does not conflict..... JW's already report when mandatory, right?
Two witness rule? they can do that too....
Just let the police do their job (as JW witnesses keep bragging "We do not get in the way of a police investigation") and THEN the JW's can do whatever ritual they very well like to do.
The law will not be taking away their right to worship as they please, interpret the Bible as they please, the JWs will simply do it AFTER the police investigation.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
wednesday 5 , day 7 live hearing.
case study 29, july 2015, sydney.
